the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
SAFENET – Fracture evolution in crystalline rocks (from lab to in-situ scale)
Abstract. The DECOVALEX Task SAFENET is dedicated to advancing the understanding of fracture nucleation and evolution processes in crystalline rocks, with applications in nuclear waste management and geothermal reservoir engineering. Further improvement of fracture mechanics models is required in two distinct areas. Firstly, there is a need to enhance numerical methods for fracture mechanics under varying thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) conditions. Secondly, there is a requirement to develop applied tools for performance and safety assessment in the context of nuclear waste management, as well as for reservoir optimisation in geothermal applications. Building on the achievements of SAFENET, which concentrated on benchmarking fracture models and experimental laboratory analyses, SAFENET-2 is dedicated to extending and validating models from the laboratory to the field scale.
This paper gives a detailed description of the work plan for Safenet-2 of the experimental program and the modeling exercises. The experiments will be carried out at the rock mechanics laboratories of the Universities of Edinburgh and Chongqing. For field data, the STIMTEC experiment at the Reiche Zeche teaching and research mine (Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg) is used. The paper gives a detailed description of the individual steps of the task. As a result of Safenet, the benchmark suite will be made available as interactive exercises via a web portal, thus promoting the concept of open science. The paper will help the teams to organize their work efficiently and also provide an overview and insight to the community.
- Preprint
(7365 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Nov 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on sand-2024-2', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Oct 2024
reply
This is a good basis for a project task like DECOVALEX-2027 SAFENET. It allows the general public to follow and even participate in this study. Therefore this is a very good example of transparency for the public. However, as a scientific paper, it should be revised taking into account the following points:
- The introduction should describe work on the general progress of the granite study, in particular on the issue of deep disposal. It should answer the following questions:
- Why is granite suitable for high-level waste disposal?
- What are the main problems to be solved in this context?
- What are the main outcomes of the past phases of DECOVLAEX before D2023?
- The experimental data are presented in a very heterogeneous manner. The experimental data in the section 2.2.1 are described in detail, but 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 are very limited without results.
- Results from the previous phase D2023 should be summarized in one section.
- The intention to compare such complex tests as benchmarking is good, but a big challenge. Would it be possible to summarized some numerical methods used in the previous phase?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2024-2-RC1 - The introduction should describe work on the general progress of the granite study, in particular on the issue of deep disposal. It should answer the following questions:
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
138 | 27 | 26 | 191 | 5 | 3 |
- HTML: 138
- PDF: 27
- XML: 26
- Total: 191
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1