Communicating scientific uncertainties
Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection (IRS), Leibniz
University Hanover, 30419 Hanover, Germany
Volker Mintzlaff
Institut für Geomechanik und Geotechnik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Related authors
Wolfgang Schulz, Cord Drögemüller, Roman Seidl, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within our transdisciplinary research project (www.transens.de), we work jointly with 14 citizens (citizen working group or CWG) who are interested in the topic without being activists or having a specific agenda. The CWG helps us to enrich the research process with experiential knowledge. Parallel to gaining scientific knowledge, trust can be built due to close collaboration.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, and Rosa Sierra
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 27–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the first part, we highlight the twofold responsibility concerning the current generation’s decision-making perspective for present and future generations. According to our survey data and a debate with citizens, we see the need to discuss the respective weighing of directly affected generations during the next few decades (until the repository’s closure, which affects about four to five generations) compared to justice for (five +) future generations in the following decades and centuries.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, Pius Krütli, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 211–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In our project, several disciplines work on issues concerning the management of high-level nuclear waste in Germany. In our sub-project on trust, we have enlisted a group of 16 citizens, reflecting with us on our research questions and approaches. From joint workshops of researchers and these citizens on the role of trust in scientists we find that participants generally want to be taken seriously. Transparent and binding rules for all participants could be the key to a trusting relationship.
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
Wolfgang Schulz, Cord Drögemüller, Roman Seidl, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within our transdisciplinary research project (www.transens.de), we work jointly with 14 citizens (citizen working group or CWG) who are interested in the topic without being activists or having a specific agenda. The CWG helps us to enrich the research process with experiential knowledge. Parallel to gaining scientific knowledge, trust can be built due to close collaboration.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, and Rosa Sierra
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 27–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the first part, we highlight the twofold responsibility concerning the current generation’s decision-making perspective for present and future generations. According to our survey data and a debate with citizens, we see the need to discuss the respective weighing of directly affected generations during the next few decades (until the repository’s closure, which affects about four to five generations) compared to justice for (five +) future generations in the following decades and centuries.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, Pius Krütli, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 211–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In our project, several disciplines work on issues concerning the management of high-level nuclear waste in Germany. In our sub-project on trust, we have enlisted a group of 16 citizens, reflecting with us on our research questions and approaches. From joint workshops of researchers and these citizens on the role of trust in scientists we find that participants generally want to be taken seriously. Transparent and binding rules for all participants could be the key to a trusting relationship.
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
Thomas Hassel, Volker Mintzlaff, Joachim Stahlmann, Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, and Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 309–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, 2021
Short summary
On the proposed poster, we report the results of an experimental study (N = 177) that investigated the preferences for and trust in different visualizations of simulation results and tested different modes of communication (verbal, numerical, and visual/graphical). The oral presentation will focus on another challenge of uncertainty communication, namely unquantifiable model uncertainties. In a repository, these may arise from the heterogeneity of the host rock.
On the proposed poster, we report the results of an experimental study (N = 177) that...