Articles | Volume 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023
Conference Abstract
 | 
06 Sep 2023
Conference Abstract |  | 06 Sep 2023

Intra- vs. intergenerational justice tradeoffs in nuclear waste storage (W01)

Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, and Rosa Sierra

Related authors

Exploring the potential for transdisciplinary co-production in the case of nuclear waste disposal (W11)
Wolfgang Schulz, Cord Drögemüller, Roman Seidl, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Communicating scientific uncertainties
Roman Seidl and Volker Mintzlaff
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 223–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023, 2023
Short summary
A citizens workgroup helps researchers reflect on their work
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, Pius Krütli, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 211–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, 2021
Short summary
Public opinion in the site selection process: survey methodologies
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
Download
Short summary
In the first part, we highlight the twofold responsibility concerning the current generation’s decision-making perspective for present and future generations. According to our survey data and a debate with citizens, we see the need to discuss the respective weighing of directly affected generations during the next few decades (until the repository’s closure, which affects about four to five generations) compared to justice for (five +) future generations in the following decades and centuries.