A note on the duration of claystone exploration programs
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
Bernhard Schuck
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
Tilo Kneuker
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
Lukas Pollok
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
André Bornemann
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
Jochen Erbacher
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hanover 30655, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Bernhard Schuck, Lisa Richter, Raphael Dlugosch, and Lukas Pollok
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 57–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-57-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
BGE, the implementer of Germany’s site selection procedure, recently outlined an alternative exploration approach. This contribution aims to detail and discuss it, based on BGR’s experience regarding the exploration of the subsurface. It focuses on geoscientific aspects and elaborates on the two main requirements to this approach, namely acceptance by the scientific community and capability to account for the specific characteristics of the host rock types while (still) ensuring comparability.
Lisa Richter, Thies Beilecke, Raphael Dlugosch, Tilo Kneuker, Lukas Pollok, Nicole Schubarth-Engelschall, and Ralf Semroch
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 55–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-55-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In phase II siting regions will be explored above ground. The exploration requirements for the siting regions define the methods to be used. BGR develops a database, GeM-DB, that allows the research for exploration methods. The database entries consist of a description, attributes and the evaluation of the suitability and applicability for the host rocks and exploration objectives. Filters and selection options allow queries of the database content to generate sequences of exploration methods.
Lukas Pollok and Mareike Henneberg
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 73–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-73-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-73-2021, 2021
Lisa Richter, Thies Beilecke, Raphael Dlugosch, Tilo Kneuker, Lukas Pollok, Nicole Schubarth-Engelschall, and Ralf Semroch
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 63–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-63-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-63-2021, 2021
Raphael Dlugosch, Thies Beilecke, Tilo Kneuker, Lukas Pollok, Lisa Richter, Nicole Schubarth-Engelschall, and Ralf Semroch
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 53–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-53-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-53-2021, 2021
Bernhard Schuck and Tilo Kneuker
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 47–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-47-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-47-2021, 2021
Gesa Ziefle, Tuanny Cajuhi, Sebastian Condamin, Stephan Costabel, Oliver Czaikowski, Antoine Fourriére, Larissa Friedenberg, Markus Furche, Nico Graebling, Bastian Graupner, Jürgen Hesser, David Jaeggi, Kyra Jantschik, Tilo Kneuker, Olaf Kolditz, Franz Königer, Herbert Kunz, Ben Laurich, Jobst Maßmann, Christian Ostertag-Henning, Dorothee Rebscher, Karsten Rink, Wolfram Rühaak, Senecio Schefer, Rainer Schuhmann, Marc Wengler, and Klaus Wieczorek
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 79–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-79-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-79-2021, 2021
Bernhard Schuck, Anja M. Schleicher, Christoph Janssen, Virginia G. Toy, and Georg Dresen
Solid Earth, 11, 95–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-95-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-95-2020, 2020
Oliver Friedrich, Sietske J. Batenburg, Kazuyoshi Moriya, Silke Voigt, Cécile Cournède, Iris Möbius, Peter Blum, André Bornemann, Jens Fiebig, Takashi Hasegawa, Pincelli M. Hull, Richard D. Norris, Ursula Röhl, Thomas Westerhold, Paul A. Wilson, and IODP Expedition
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2016-51, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2016-51, 2016
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
A lack of knowledge on the timing of Late Cretaceous climatic change inhibits our understanding of underlying causal mechanisms. Therefore, we used an expanded deep ocean record from the North Atlantic that shows distinct sedimentary cyclicity suggesting orbital forcing. A high-resolution carbon-isotope record from bulk carbonates allows to identify global trends in the carbon cycle. Our new carbon isotope record and the established cyclostratigraphy may serve as a future reference site.
N. A. G. M. van Helmond, A. Sluijs, J. S. Sinninghe Damsté, G.-J. Reichart, S. Voigt, J. Erbacher, J. Pross, and H. Brinkhuis
Clim. Past, 11, 495–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-495-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-495-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the chemistry and microfossils preserved in sediments deposited in a shallow sea, in the current Lower Saxony region (NW Germany), we conclude that changes in Earth’s orbit around the Sun led to enhanced rainfall and organic matter production. The additional supply of organic matter, depleting oxygen upon degradation, and freshwater, inhibiting the mixing of oxygen-rich surface waters with deeper waters, caused the development of oxygen-poor waters about 94 million years ago.
Short summary
This contribution outlines that the BGE, implementer of Germany’s site selection procedure for a nuclear waste repository, likely underestimates the time necessary to characterize claystones within potential siting regions. Our latest experience originates from two research projects that developed sequence stratigraphic frameworks for largely homogenous claystone successions in Germany. We reckoned a total duration of 5 years for the workload in each of the abovementioned research projects.
This contribution outlines that the BGE, implementer of Germany’s site selection procedure for...