Transdisciplinary research on repository safety: challenges and opportunities
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Disposal Research (IELF), Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Marcel Ebeling
Institute of Disposal Research (IELF), Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Anne Eckhardt
risicare GmbH, 8125 Zollikerberg, Switzerland
Peter Hocke
Institute of Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS) at KIT, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Pius Krütli
Transdisciplinarity Lab, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Related authors
Anne Eckhardt, Martina Heiermann, Dirk Kluge, and Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 187–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-187-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-187-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the workshop
Optimising the safety case through transdisciplinary research?, we want to discuss how safety cases on the disposal path for high-level radioactive waste can be optimised in a transdisciplinary way. The workshop not only offers the opportunity to exchange ideas on topics concerning the safety case, such as the design of a digital safety case, but also to get experiences with transdisciplinary methods and tools first hand.
Anne Eckhardt, Pius Krütli, and Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 83–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peer reviews are conducted to improve the quality of scientific publications and can also be applied to the safety case. Research within the TRANSENS project suggests that extending the spectrum of reviewers and using transdisciplinary methods and tools in reviews not only opens perspectives to improve the quality, legitimacy, and acceptance of a safety case, but also increases the resilience of safety on the disposal pathway.
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Peter Hocke, Pius Krütli, René Martin, and Ulrich Smeddinck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 203–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using case examples, insights and experiences from a complex conceptualisation and application process and two years research experience in the TRANSENS project will be presented taking the views of the involved (standing
Working Group Populationand scientists). Particularly, the understanding of transdisciplinarity will be discussed given the varying definitions in literature.
Thomas Hassel, Volker Mintzlaff, Joachim Stahlmann, Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, and Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 309–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, 2021
Anne Eckhardt, Martina Heiermann, Dirk Kluge, and Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 187–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-187-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-187-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the workshop
Optimising the safety case through transdisciplinary research?, we want to discuss how safety cases on the disposal path for high-level radioactive waste can be optimised in a transdisciplinary way. The workshop not only offers the opportunity to exchange ideas on topics concerning the safety case, such as the design of a digital safety case, but also to get experiences with transdisciplinary methods and tools first hand.
Anne Eckhardt, Pius Krütli, and Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 83–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peer reviews are conducted to improve the quality of scientific publications and can also be applied to the safety case. Research within the TRANSENS project suggests that extending the spectrum of reviewers and using transdisciplinary methods and tools in reviews not only opens perspectives to improve the quality, legitimacy, and acceptance of a safety case, but also increases the resilience of safety on the disposal pathway.
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Peter Hocke, Pius Krütli, René Martin, and Ulrich Smeddinck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 203–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using case examples, insights and experiences from a complex conceptualisation and application process and two years research experience in the TRANSENS project will be presented taking the views of the involved (standing
Working Group Populationand scientists). Particularly, the understanding of transdisciplinarity will be discussed given the varying definitions in literature.
Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 285–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-285-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-285-2021, 2021
Thomas Hassel, Volker Mintzlaff, Joachim Stahlmann, Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, and Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 309–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, 2021
Stefanie Enderle and Peter Hocke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 193–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-193-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-193-2021, 2021
Short summary
For specialists, the tool
Safety Case(in the German site selection procedure:
Sicherheitsuntersuchung) is an established instrument for supporting safety-relevant decisions in a stepwise disposal programme. Actors, affected individuals and interested persons have different notions and value judgements about it, though. In the TRANSENS project, it is planned to reveal these notions and judgements and, if possible, to derive conclusions about optimising the safety case concept.
For specialists, the tool
Safety Case(in the German site selection procedure:...