Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal
Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal
SaND

Volume 1, 2021 | Interdisciplinary Research Symposium on the Safety of Nuclear Disposal Practices safeND

Berlin (and online), 10–12 November 2021
Editor(s): J. Birkholzer, S. Gentes, A. Hentschel, W. Hund, K. Kalmbach, P. Nanz, B. Reichert, C. Ritzi, F.-N. Sentuc, K. Spahiu, and H. Völzke
Volumes
Volumes

Volume 1, 2021 | Interdisciplinary Research Symposium on the Safety of Nuclear Disposal Practices safeND

Berlin (and online), 10–12 November 2021
Editor(s): J. Birkholzer, S. Gentes, A. Hentschel, W. Hund, K. Kalmbach, P. Nanz, B. Reichert, C. Ritzi, F.-N. Sentuc, K. Spahiu, and H. Völzke
10 Nov 2021
Preface
Jochen Ahlswede
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 1–2, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-1-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-1-2021, 2021
1a) Interim storage of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel
10 Nov 2021
Development of a mobile, automated, optical inspection system for radioactive barrels
Tania Barretto, Eric Rentschler, and Sascha Gentes
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 3–4, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-3-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-3-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Spectroscopic and chemical investigations on volatile fission and activation products within the fuel-cladding interface of irradiated pressurised water reactor fuel rod segments
Tobias König, Ron Dagan, Kathy Dardenne, Michel Herm, Volker Metz, Tim Pruessmann, Jörg Rothe, Dieter Schild, Arndt Walschburger, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 5–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-5-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-5-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Actinides induced irradiation damage and swelling effect in irradiated Zircaloy-4 after 30 years of storage
Mara Marchetti, Michel Herm, Tobias König, Simone Manenti, and Volker Metz
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 7–8, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-7-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-7-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
PREDIS: innovative ways for predisposal treatment and monitoring of low and medium radioactive waste
Ernst Niederleithinger, Vera Lay, Christian Köpp, Erika Holt, and Maria Oksa
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 9–10, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-9-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-9-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Developing a radiation field-based monitoring system for the transport and storage cask inventory during extended interim storage
Mira Stephan, Sebastian Reinicke, Alexander Kratzsch, Michael Wagner, Sebastian Kobelt, and Uwe Hampel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 11–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-11-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-11-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Structural integrity investigations of spent nuclear fuel with finite element modeling
Efstathios Vlassopoulos, Susanne Pudollek, Olympios Alifieris, Dimitrios Papaioannou, Ramil Nasyrow, Ralf Gretter, Vincenzo V. Rondinella, and Stefano Caruso
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 13–14, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-13-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-13-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Distributed fiber optic radiation sensors
Aleksander Wosniok and Katerina Krebber
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 15–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-15-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-15-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Impact of Radiation-Induced Microstructures on the Integrity of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Elements in Long-Term Storage
Neslihan Yanikömer, Rahim Nabbi, and Klaus Fischer-Appelt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 17–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-17-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-17-2021, 2021
Short summary
1b) Decommissioning of nuclear facilities
10 Nov 2021
Explanations for the development of a novel universally inside pipe separator for dismantling (contaminated) pipelines
Madeleine Bachmann and Sascha Gentes
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 19–20, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-19-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-19-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Mobile attachment for automated crack milling
Birte Froebus, Sascha Gentes, and Christoph Unverzagt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 21–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-21-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-21-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Development of an automated milling system for the decontamination of the wall surface in a nuclear power plant
Chang Li, Siavash Kazemi, and Sascha Gentes
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 23–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-23-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-23-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Radiological characterization of a German pressurized water reactor based on a highly resolved method for activity analysis and dose rate calculation
Markus Nolden, Agnes Scaramus, Rahim Nabbi, Frank Charlier, and Klaus Fischer-Appelt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 25–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-25-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-25-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
LD-SAFE: laser dismantling environmental and safety assessment
Damien Roulet, Pierre Daguin, Séverine Paillard, Ioana Doyen, Julien Favrichon, Emmanuel Porcheron, Patrice François, Antonis Calogiros, Anton Nulens, and Tomas Adrian Recio Miranda
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 27–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-27-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-27-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Development of a novel tool for automation of the contamination measurement
Alena Wernke and Sascha Gentes
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 29–30, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-29-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-29-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Modelling of hydrodynamic and solute transport with consideration of the release of low-level radioactive substances
Roman Winter, Bernd Flemisch, Holger Class, and Rainer Merk
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 31–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-31-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-31-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Development and testing of a tool for the decontamination of corners and inner edges on concrete surfaces
Shanyao Zhang, Sascha Gentes, Kurt Heppler, Alexander Heneka, Carla-Olivia Krauß, Johannes Greb, Fabian Hammer, Philipp Dietrich, and Stefan Stemmle
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 33–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-33-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-33-2021, 2021
2a) Site selection – methods and overviews
10 Nov 2021
Methods for safety-related weighting and comparative assessment in the site selection process (MABeSt)
Gerd Frieling, Klaus Fischer-Appelt, Ute Maurer-Rurack, Thomas Beuth, and Guido Bracke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 35–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-35-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-35-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Preliminary safety assessments in the high-level radioactive waste site selection procedure in Germany
Eva-Maria Hoyer, Phillip Kreye, Thomas Lohser, and Wolfram Rühaak
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 37–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-37-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-37-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Development of a database for the analysis of the disposal system in the representative preliminary safety analysis
Eva-Maria Hoyer, Paulina Müller, Phillip Kreye, Christoph Behrens, Marc Wengler, Tobias Wengorsch, and Wolfram Rühaak
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 39–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-39-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-39-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Can a repository site be safer than safe? – Criteria and methods for a safety-oriented comparison of repository sites
Martin Navarro, Ingo Kock, Gerd Frieling, and Thomas Beuth
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 41–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-41-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-41-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Suitability of flat bedded salt formations in Germany as the site for a repository for heat-producing radioactive waste
Till Popp, Ralf-Michael Günther, and Dirk Naumann
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 43–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-43-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-43-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Geoscientific Characterization and Interpretation (Geosynthesis) within the Preliminary Safety Assessment in the German Site-Selection Procedure for a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository
Sönke Reiche, Reinhard Fink, and Nils-Peter Nilius
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 45–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-45-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-45-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Claystone formations in Germany: what we (don't) know about them and how we can change this
Bernhard Schuck and Tilo Kneuker
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 47–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-47-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-47-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Section 14 StandAG – Identification of siting regions and associated challenges
Lisa Seidel and Marc Wengler
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 49–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-49-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-49-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Site selection for the best clay-hosted repository in Switzerland
Tim Vietor and Michael Schnellmann
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 51–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-51-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-51-2021, 2021
Short summary
2b) Surface exploration methods
10 Nov 2021
A systematic approach for surface exploration of sites – a database to research and evaluate suitable methods
Raphael Dlugosch, Thies Beilecke, Tilo Kneuker, Lukas Pollok, Lisa Richter, Nicole Schubarth-Engelschall, and Ralf Semroch
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 53–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-53-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-53-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Investigation of Surface Exploration Programs for Hydrological, Hydrogeological and Hydrogeochemical Issues in the Site Selection Procedure
Kirsten Haneke, Martin Goldsworthy, José B. Pateiro Fernández, Christoph Pieper, Bettina Starke, Andreas Schuck, and Christoph Borkel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 57–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-57-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-57-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Measurement Methods for Above-ground Site Investigation Programmes according to StandAG (Project “MessEr”) – an Overview
Ingo Kock, Michael Jendras, Thorsten Faß, Gerd Frieling, Wolfram Wartenberg, and Karsten Leopold
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 59–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-59-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-59-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Terrestrial photogrammetry: a method to gather data on fractures for DFN modelling from exposed rock surfaces
Filip Loeckle
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 61–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-61-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-61-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
A systematic approach for surface exploration of sites – analysis of international exploration programs
Lisa Richter, Thies Beilecke, Raphael Dlugosch, Tilo Kneuker, Lukas Pollok, Nicole Schubarth-Engelschall, and Ralf Semroch
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 63–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-63-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-63-2021, 2021
2c) Tectonics and geomechanics of the potential host rocks for nuclear waste
10 Nov 2021
Permeability variation in crystalline rocks due to low-grade solution phenomena
Rüdiger Kilian and Michael Stipp
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 65–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-65-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-65-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The anisotropic properties of granites – effects of tectonic emplacement mode on potential crystalline host rocks for nuclear waste deposits in Germany
Uwe Kroner, Peter Hallas, and Franz Müller
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 67–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-67-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-67-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Characterizing the microstructural anisotropy of fine-grained phyllosilicate-rich rocks
Rebecca Kühn, Michael Stipp, and Bernd Leiss
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 69–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-69-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-69-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
An Open-Access Stress Magnitude Database for Germany
Sophia Morawietz, Moritz Ziegler, Karsten Reiter, and the SpannEnD Project Team
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 71–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-71-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-71-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Sub-areas in steep rock salt formations – what do we know about the geological composition of North German salt structures?
Lukas Pollok and Mareike Henneberg
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 73–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-73-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-73-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The SpannEnD project: 3-D stress prediction in the upper crust of Germany
Karsten Reiter, Steffen Ahlers, Sophia Morawietz, Luisa Röckel, Tobias Hergert, Andreas Henk, Birgit Müller, and Oliver Heidbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 75–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-75-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-75-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Slip tendency analysis of major faults in Germany
Luisa Röckel, Steffen Ahlers, Sophia Morawietz, Birgit Müller, Karsten Reiter, Oliver Heidbach, Andreas Henk, Tobias Hergert, and Frank Schilling
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 77–78, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-77-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-77-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
From process to system understanding with multi-disciplinary investigation methods: set-up and first results of the CD-A experiment (Mont Terri rock laboratory)
Gesa Ziefle, Tuanny Cajuhi, Sebastian Condamin, Stephan Costabel, Oliver Czaikowski, Antoine Fourriére, Larissa Friedenberg, Markus Furche, Nico Graebling, Bastian Graupner, Jürgen Hesser, David Jaeggi, Kyra Jantschik, Tilo Kneuker, Olaf Kolditz, Franz Königer, Herbert Kunz, Ben Laurich, Jobst Maßmann, Christian Ostertag-Henning, Dorothee Rebscher, Karsten Rink, Wolfram Rühaak, Senecio Schefer, Rainer Schuhmann, Marc Wengler, and Klaus Wieczorek
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 79–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-79-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-79-2021, 2021
2d) Deep geological disposal – understanding processes in the multi-barrier system
10 Nov 2021
Can we safely go to 200 °C? An integrated approach to assessing impacts to the engineered barrier system in a high-temperature repository
Jens T. Birkholzer, Liange Zheng, and Jonny Rutqvist
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 83–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-83-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-83-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
An interdisciplinary view of the long-term evolution of repository systems across scales: the iCROSS project
Dirk Bosbach, Horst Geckeis, Frank Heberling, Olaf Kolditz, Michael Kühn, Katharina Müller, Thorsten Stumpf, and the iCROSS team
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 85–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-85-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-85-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
In situ corrosion of canister materials in bentonite: the IC-A experiment at Mont Terri
Nikitas Diomidis and Bharti Reddy
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 89–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-89-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-89-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Evaluation of the corrosion behavior of modern spent nuclear fuels under repository conditions
Philip Kegler, Martina Klinkenberg, Felix Brandt, Guido Deissmann, and Dirk Bosbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 91–93, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-91-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-91-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Investigation of Percolation-Driven Fluid Transport in Rock Salt under Repository-Relevant Conditions (PeTroS)
Christoph Lüdeling, Dirk Naumann, and Wolfgang Minkley
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 95–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-95-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-95-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
On the temperature in a final disposal site for high-level radioactive waste
Ute Maurer-Rurack, Guido Bracke, Eva Hartwig-Thurat, Artur Meleshyn, and Torben Weyand
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 99–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-99-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-99-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Mineral stability, brine development and rock-fluid reaction at repository-relevant temperatures (T < 200 °C) in the potential host rock rock salt
Michael Mertineit and Michael Schramm
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 101–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-101-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-101-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Anaerobic corrosion of carbon steel in compacted bentonite exposed to natural Opalinus clay porewater: Bentonite alteration study
Nikoleta Morelová, Kathy Dardenne, Nicolas Finck, Frank Heberling, Volker Metz, Dieter Schild, Horst Geckeis, and Nikitas Diomidis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 103–104, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-103-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-103-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Combining innovative experimental approaches and cross-scale reactive transport modelling for assessing coupled hydrogeochemical processes at interfaces in deep geological repositories for radioactive waste
Jenna Poonoosamy, Martina Klinkenberg, Mara Lönartz, Yuankai Yang, Guido Deissmann, Felix Brandt, and Dirk Bosbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 105–107, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-105-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-105-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Simulating the feedback between corrosive gas generation and water availability for the evaluation of radionuclide mobility in the context of radioactive waste disposal
Laurin Wissmeier and Joachim Poppei
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 109–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-109-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-109-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Overview of Post-Closure Criticality Safety – RD&D Topics in Switzerland
Madalina Wittel and Susanne Pudollek
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 111–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-111-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-111-2021, 2021
2e) Advances in designing geotechnical barrier materials
10 Nov 2021
Methodology of structured development and validation of multiphysical constitutive models using the example of crushed salt compaction under 3D THM load conditions
Uwe Düsterloh and Svetlana Lerche
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 113–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-113-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-113-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Pilot plant tests to demonstrate the functionality of sealing elements made of salt cut bricks
Uwe Düsterloh, Svetlana Lerche, and Juan Zhao
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 117–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-117-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-117-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Compaction of crushed salt for safe containment – overview of the KOMPASS project
Larissa Friedenberg, James Bean, Oliver Czaikowski, Uwe Düsterloh, Nina Müller-Hoeppe, Ben Laurich, Christian Lerch, Svetlana Lerche, Christoph Lüdeling, Melissa Mills, Till Popp, Benjamin Reedlunn, Dieter Stührenberg, Kristoff Svensson, Kornelia Zemke, and Juan Zhao
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 121–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-121-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-121-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Discussion of parameters used to distinguish suitable from less suitable HLRW bentonites
Stephan Kaufhold
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 125–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-125-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-125-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
SealWasteSafe: materials technology, monitoring techniques, and quality assurance for safe sealing structures in underground repositories
Vera Lay, Franziska Baensch, Sergej Johann, Patrick Sturm, Frank Mielentz, Prathik Prabhakara, Detlef Hofmann, Ernst Niederleithinger, and Hans-Carsten Kühne
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 127–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-127-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-127-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Michigan International Copper Analogue (MICA) project – current status
Axel Liebscher, Heini Reijonen, Ismo Aaltonen, Christina Lilja, Simon Norris, Lindsay Waffle, and Nikitas Diomidis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 129–130, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-129-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-129-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Deformation mechanisms and their microstructural indicators in the compaction of crushed salt as a geotechnical barrier
Kristoff Svensson, Kornelia Zemke, and Ben Laurich
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 131–132, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-131-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-131-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Large-scale testing of a sandwich shaft-sealing system at the Mont Terri rock laboratory
Klaus Wieczorek, Katja Emmerich, Rainer Schuhmann, Jürgen Hesser, Markus Furche, David Jaeggi, Senecio Schefer, Jan Aurich, Juan Carlos Mayor, Simon Norris, Ken Birch, Manuel Sentis, José Luis García-Siñeriz, Franz Königer, Uwe Glaubach, Christopher Rölke, and Ralf Diedel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 133–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-133-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-133-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Over 30 years of research on crushed salt as a barrier material: fundamental findings and open questions
Kornelia Zemke, Kristoff Svensson, Ben Laurich, and Johanna Lippmann-Pipke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 137–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-137-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-137-2021, 2021
2f) Chemistry and migration behaviour of radionuclides
10 Nov 2021
Impact of the heterogeneity of the sandy Opalinus clay facies at the Mont Terri underground research laboratory on radionuclide migration
Naila Ait-Mouheb, Yuankai Yang, Luc R. Van Loon, Martin A. Glaus, Guido Deissmann, and Dirk Bosbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 141–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-141-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-141-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Dissolution of simplified nuclear waste glass and formation of secondary phases
Felix Brandt, Martina Klinkenberg, Sébastien Caes, Jenna Poonoosamy, Wouter Van Renterghem, Juri Barthel, Karel Lemmens, Dirk Bosbach, and Karine Ferrand
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 143–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-143-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-143-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Spatially resolved sorption of Cm(III) on crystalline rock: influence of surface roughness and mineralogy
Maximilian Demnitz, Konrad Molodtsov, Stefan Schymura, Ariette Schierz, Katharina Müller, and Moritz Schmidt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 145–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-145-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-145-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Radionuclide geochemistry: solubility and thermodynamics in an HLW repository
David Fellhauer, Xavier Gaona, Marcus Altmaier, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 149–150, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-149-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-149-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Cement as a component of the multi-barrier system: radionuclide retention in cementitious environments
Xavier Gaona, Marcus Altmaier, Iuliia Androniuk, Nese Çevirim-Papaioannou, Michel Herm, Luis Iglesias-Perez, Yongheum Jo, Volker Metz, Andrej Skerencak-Frech, Agost Tasi, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 151–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-151-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-151-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Diffusive transport of uranium and americium through clay rock down to ultra-trace levels
Daniel Glückman, Karin Hain, Claudia Joseph, Volker Metz, Francesca Quinto, Peter Steier, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 153–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-153-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-153-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Microscopic and spectroscopic investigations of uranium(VI) reduction by Desulfosporosinus hippei DSM 8344
Stephan Hilpmann, Robin Steudtner, Björn Drobot, René Hübner, Frank Bok, Thorsten Stumpf, and Andrea Cherkouk
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 155–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-155-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-155-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
THEREDA – Thermodynamic Reference Database
Helge C. Moog, Tina Scharge, Holger Seher, Frank Bok, Vinzenz Brendler, Anke Richter, Laurin Wissmeier, Marcus Altmaier, Xavier Gaona, Nese Cevirim-Papaioannou, Daniela Freyer, Melanie Pannach, Julia Sohr, and Wolfgang Voigt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 157–158, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-157-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-157-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Impact of increased temperatures on the geochemical behaviour of trivalent actinides in aquatic systems
Andrej Skerencak-Frech, Petra Panak, Kathy Dardenne, Jörg Rothe, Xavier Gaona, Marcus Altmaier, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 159–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-159-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-159-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Geochemical benchmark tests to validate the conversion of thermodynamic data for TOUGHREACT
Torben Weyand, Holger Seher, and Guido Bracke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 161–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-161-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-161-2021, 2021
2g) Numerical modelling for long-term safety analyses
10 Nov 2021
The recent stress state of Germany – results of a geomechanical–numerical 3D model
Steffen Ahlers, Andreas Henk, Tobias Hergert, Karsten Reiter, Birgit Müller, Luisa Röckel, Oliver Heidbach, Sophia Morawietz, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Denis Anikiev
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 163–164, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-163-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-163-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Building the bridge between safety requirements and numerical modeling: an example considering crack development of Opalinus clay in laboratory and field scales
Tuanny Cajuhi, Jobst Maßmann, and Gesa Ziefle
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 165–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-165-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-165-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Reactive transport modelling of long-term interactions between iron and MX-80 bentonite
M. Carme Chaparro, Nicolas Finck, Volker Metz, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 169–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-169-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Development and quality assurance of computer programs for the review of long-term safety analysis
Jens Eckel, Martin Navarro, and Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 171–172, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-171-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-171-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Numerical Analysis of the integrity of potential host rocks – modelling thermo-hydro-mechanical processes in the containment providing rock zone
Carlos Guevara Morel​​​​​​​, Jobst Maßmann, and Jan Thiedau
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 173–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-173-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-173-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
AREHS: effects of changing boundary conditions on the development of hydrogeological systems: numerical long-term modelling considering thermal–hydraulic–mechanical(–chemical) coupled effects
René Kahnt, Heinz Konietzky, Thomas Nagel, Olaf Kolditz, Andreas Jockel, Christian B. Silbermann, Friederike Tiedke, Tobias Meisel, Karsten Rink, Wenqing Wang, Florian Zill, Antje Carl, Aron D. Gabriel, Marcel Schlegel, and Torsten Abraham
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 175–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-175-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-175-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Hydro-mechanical effects of seismic events in crystalline rock barriers
Dominik Kern, Fabien Magri, Victor I. Malkovsky, and Thomas Nagel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 179–180, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-179-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-179-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Deciphering porosity clogging at barrier interfaces in deep geological repositories for radioactive waste
Mara I. Lönartz, Jenna Poonoosamy, Yuankai Yang, Naila Ait-Mouheb, Guido Deissmann, and Dirk Bosbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 181–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-181-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-181-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Identification and evaluation of processes for joint disposal of high level radioactive waste and low to intermediate level radioactive waste
Andreas Poller, Susie M. L. Hardie, Gerhard Mayer, Marie Pijorr, Joachim Poppei, Paul Smith, Luca Urpi, and Laurin Wissmeier
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 183–184, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-183-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-183-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Open Source Software Library for Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupled Processes in Python
Carsten Rücker
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 185–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-185-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Uncertainties in geomechanical models – exhaustive vs. feasible approach
Moritz Ziegler and Oliver Heidbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 187–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-187-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-187-2021, 2021
Short summary
3a) Nuclear Humanities
10 Nov 2021
What is good drinking water? 41 years of water conflicts around the Nuclear Research Centre Karlsruhe, 1956–1997
Alicia Gutting
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 189–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-189-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-189-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Fukushima as Australia's nuclear heritage
N. A. J. Taylor
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 191–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-191-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-191-2021, 2021
3b) Nuclear Social Sciences
10 Nov 2021
Narratives and images of the future for final disposal
Stefanie Enderle and Peter Hocke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 193–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-193-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-193-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
A tentative useful-for-all definition of “safety” in the context of radioactive waste disposal
Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 195–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-195-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-195-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The Secret of the Copper Box: public experiments and the prospects of living archives of Swedish nuclear waste
Thomas P. Keating and Anna Storm
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 197–198, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-197-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-197-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Radioactive waste management ethics and public policy: a precautionary approach
Daniel Oross, Miklos Zala, and Eszter Matyas
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 199–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-199-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-199-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Justice in dealing with highly radioactive waste – an empirical perspective
Lucas Schwarz
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 201–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-201-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-201-2021, 2021
16 Dec 2021
Does gentle regulation have a chance?
Ulrich Smeddinck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 311–311, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-311-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-311-2021, 2021
3c) Challenges & solutions of disposal site research and transdisciplinarity
10 Nov 2021
Application-oriented transdisciplinary basic research on nuclear waste management: hollow phrase or sensible concept?
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Peter Hocke, Pius Krütli, René Martin, and Ulrich Smeddinck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 203–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Transdisciplinary research on repository safety: challenges and opportunities
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Marcel Ebeling, Anne Eckhardt, Peter Hocke, and Pius Krütli
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 205–207, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-205-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-205-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Improving Participation in the German Search for a Nuclear Waste Repository Site: a WebGIS as a Transdisciplinary Approach to Support Dialogue?
Lucas Schwarz and Paula Bräuer
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 209–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-209-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-209-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
A citizens workgroup helps researchers reflect on their work
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, Pius Krütli, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 211–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-211-2021, 2021
Short summary
3d) Participation in the search for a nuclear disposal site
10 Nov 2021
From a hard nuclear state towards a soft nuclear repository state – participation, co-designing, learning and reversibility in the site selection process for a nuclear waste repository
Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Lucas Schwarz, and Dörte Themann
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-215-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-215-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Management of high-level radioactive waste in Germany: roads from storage towards disposal – need and options for action
Saleem Chaudry, Angelika Spieth-Achtnich, and Wilhelm Bollingerfehr
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 217–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-217-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-217-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Representing future generations in public participation procedures regarding the siting of a nuclear waste repository
Lisa P. Hamacher
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 219–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-219-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-219-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Transdisciplinary disposal governance – Learning and reflexion in and between organisations and through participation of the public
Melanie Mbah, Bettina Brohmann, and Silvia Schütte
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 221–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-221-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-221-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Participation of the foreign public in the site selection procedure: prerequisites and the question of informal participation
Silvia Schütte and Johannes Franke
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 225–226, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-225-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-225-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Specific cultural and political challenges in cross-border public participation
Franziska Sperfeld and Melanie Mbah
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 227–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-227-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-227-2021, 2021
Short summary
4a) Activities in international research programs and collaborations
10 Nov 2021
International collaboration in disposal research: comparative modeling of coupled processes in the DECOVALEX project
Jens T. Birkholzer and Alex Bond
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 231–232, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-231-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-231-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
The European DISCO project: deep geological disposal of modern spent nuclear fuel
Dirk Bosbach and Lena Z. Evins
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 233–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-233-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-233-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management EURAD: update of its strategic research agenda
Dirk Bosbach, Crina Bucur, and Christophe Bruggeman
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 235–236, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-235-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-235-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Twenty years of research on spent nuclear fuel in the context of final disposal at KIT-INE in multinational collaborative projects
Michel Herm, Elke Bohnert, Luis Iglesias Pérez, Tobias König, Volker Metz, Arndt Walschburger, and Horst Geckeis
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 237–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-237-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-237-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The Grimsel Test Site – more than 35 years of underground research
Andrew J. Martin and Ingo Blechschmidt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 239–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-239-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-239-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
International safeguards for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel – why, what and how
Irmgard Niemeyer, Katharina Aymanns, Guido Deissmann, and Dirk Bosbach
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 241–242, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-241-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-241-2021, 2021
Short summary
4b) From decades of international RD&D to a sustainably knowledge and information management
10 Nov 2021
Knowledge Management in EURAD: the Roadmap
Tara Beattie, Paul Carbol, Bernd Grambow, Tobias Knuuti, Louise Théodon, and Piet Zuidema
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 243–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-243-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-243-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
EURAD School of Radioactive Waste Management
Niels Belmans and Michèle Coeck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 245–246, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-245-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-245-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Including Civil Society in R&D Projects on Radioactive Waste Management: interactions with Civil Society (ICS) in EURAD
Julien Dewoghelaere, Gilles Heriard-Dubreuil, Nadja Zeleznik​​​​​​​, Johan Swahn, Honorine Rey​​​​​​​, and Alexis Geisler
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 247–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-247-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-247-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
State-of-Knowledge and Guidance in EURAD Knowledge Management (Work Packages 11 State-of-Knowledge & 12 Guidance)
Astrid Göbel, Tobias Knuuti, Carola Franzen, Dinara Abbasova, Thuro Arnold, Vinzenz Brendler, Kateryna Fuzik, Jiří Faltejsek, Bálint Nős, Nadja Železnik, and Jitka Mikšová
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 249–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-249-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-249-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Knowledge Management in the Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal (BGE)
Gunnar Hoefer, Sebastian Wanka, and Peter L. Wellmann
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 251–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-251-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-251-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Comparing two concepts of the OECD-NEA RK&M Initiative (2011–2019): The Set of Essential Records and the Key Information File
Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 255–256, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-255-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-255-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
IAEA compiling state of knowledge and developing high level guidance in radioactive waste management
Stefan Mayer and Rebecca Robbins
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 257–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-257-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-257-2021, 2021
Short summary
4c) Alternative waste management options: an overview and state of the art
10 Nov 2021
Alternative Disposal Options for High-Level Radioactive Waste
Matthias Englert, Simone Mohr, Saleem Chaudry, and Stephan Kurth
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 259–260, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-259-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-259-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Assessment of Partitioning and Transmutation of High-Level Waste and Hypothetical Implementation Scenarios in Germany
Friederike Frieß, Wolfgang Liebert, and Nikolaus Müllner
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-261-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-261-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Deep borehole disposal of intermediate-level waste
Dirk Mallants, John Phalen, and Hef Griffiths
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 263–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-263-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-263-2021, 2021
Short summary
4d) Interdisciplinary insights on decomissioning
10 Nov 2021
What happens when the nuclear power plant goes? Social and economic consequences of dismantling for the site and its population
Caroline Kramer
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 265–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-265-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-265-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Research needs in nuclear decommissioning: an analysis based on stakeholders' points of view
Simone Müller, Muhammad Junaid Ejaz Chaudhry, Angelika Bohnstedt, Sascha Gentes, Christine Georges, Laura Aldave De Las Heras, Emilio Garcia Neri, Anthony Banford, and Kurt Van Den Dungen
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 267–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-267-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-267-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Transdisciplinary research on the topic of long-term near-field monitoring of a geological repository with a view to building trust
Johann Arne Othmer, Karl-Heinz Lux, Ralf Wolters, and Jörg Feierabend
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 271–273, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-271-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-271-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Training needs assessment: identification of competence fields for the dismantling of nuclear power plants
Lisa Thomaschewski, Benjamin Weyers, and Annette Kluge
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 275–277, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-275-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-275-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The use of muon radiography in safeguarding geological repositories
Lee Thompson, Katharina Aymanns, Irmgard Niemeyer, Christiane Vieh, and Michael Weekes
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 279–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-279-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-279-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
The economic organization of decommissioning nuclear power plants – an institutional economic analysis with case studies in the US, UK, and Germany
Ben Wealer
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 281–283, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-281-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-281-2021, 2021
4e) Long-term Storage - Interdisciplinary Perspectives
10 Nov 2021
Stress factor human activities
Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 285–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-285-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-285-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Lessons from archaeology and heritage studies for the long-term preservation of records, knowledge and memory concerning deep geological disposal sites for nuclear waste
Cornelius Holtorf and Anders Högberg
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 287–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-287-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-287-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Long-term storage of information about nuclear waste. 100 000 years and beyond
Martin Kunze
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 289–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-289-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
10 Nov 2021
Issues of long-term durability of paper – Labest Papier
Heinz Joachim Schaffrath
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 291–292, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-291-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-291-2021, 2021
Short summary
WS I Best-practice for laboratory testing of low-permeability materials
10 Nov 2021
Transport in tight material enlightened by process tomography
Johannes Kulenkampff, Till Bollermann, Maria A. Cardenas Rivera, and Cornelius Fischer
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 293–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-293-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-293-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The challenge in measuring low-permeability materials: a comparison of different approaches
Ben Laurich
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 295–297, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-295-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-295-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
Workshop: Best-practice for laboratory testing low-permeable materials
Ben Laurich, Jürgen Hesser, Sibylle Mayr, Lisa Winhausen, Amin Ghanizadeh, Antonia Nitsch, Julia Leuthold, Christian Weber, and Garri Gaus
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 299–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-299-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-299-2021, 2021
10 Nov 2021
The pore pressure oscillation method as a proven tool for determining the hydraulic properties of low-permeability rocks
Lisa Winhausen, Mohammadreza Jalali, and Florian Amann
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 301–301, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-301-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-301-2021, 2021
WS II What do we need to trust in models?
10 Nov 2021
What do we need to trust in models?
Ingo Kock, Martin Navarro, Jens Eckel, Carsten Rücker, and Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 303–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-303-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-303-2021, 2021
WS III Public opinion in the site selection process: survey methodologies
10 Nov 2021
Public opinion in the site selection process: survey methodologies
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
WS IV Transdisciplinary and psychologically resilient communication in the interaction of the stakeholders
10 Nov 2021
Workshop – psychologically resilient communication between actors based on the example of a transdisciplinary approach
Oliver Straeter and Pius Krütli
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 307–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-307-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-307-2021, 2021
Short summary
WS V Safety and uncertainties – engineering approach embedded in the social context
10 Nov 2021
Workshop Safety and Uncertainty
Thomas Hassel, Volker Mintzlaff, Joachim Stahlmann, Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, and Anne Eckhardt
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 309–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-309-2021, 2021
CC BY 4.0