A citizens workgroup helps researchers reflect on their work
Roman Seidl
Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hanover, 30419 Hanover, Germany
Cord Drögemüller
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hanover, 30419 Hanover, Germany
Pius Krütli
USYS TdLab, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Clemens Walther
Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hanover, 30419 Hanover, Germany
Related authors
Wolfgang Schulz, Cord Drögemüller, Roman Seidl, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within our transdisciplinary research project (www.transens.de), we work jointly with 14 citizens (citizen working group or CWG) who are interested in the topic without being activists or having a specific agenda. The CWG helps us to enrich the research process with experiential knowledge. Parallel to gaining scientific knowledge, trust can be built due to close collaboration.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, and Rosa Sierra
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 27–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the first part, we highlight the twofold responsibility concerning the current generation’s decision-making perspective for present and future generations. According to our survey data and a debate with citizens, we see the need to discuss the respective weighing of directly affected generations during the next few decades (until the repository’s closure, which affects about four to five generations) compared to justice for (five +) future generations in the following decades and centuries.
Roman Seidl and Volker Mintzlaff
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 223–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
On the proposed poster, we report the results of an experimental study (N = 177) that investigated the preferences for and trust in different visualizations of simulation results and tested different modes of communication (verbal, numerical, and visual/graphical). The oral presentation will focus on another challenge of uncertainty communication, namely unquantifiable model uncertainties. In a repository, these may arise from the heterogeneity of the host rock.
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
Wolfgang Schulz, Cord Drögemüller, Roman Seidl, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 261–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within our transdisciplinary research project (www.transens.de), we work jointly with 14 citizens (citizen working group or CWG) who are interested in the topic without being activists or having a specific agenda. The CWG helps us to enrich the research process with experiential knowledge. Parallel to gaining scientific knowledge, trust can be built due to close collaboration.
Roman Seidl, Cord Drögemüller, and Rosa Sierra
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 27–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the first part, we highlight the twofold responsibility concerning the current generation’s decision-making perspective for present and future generations. According to our survey data and a debate with citizens, we see the need to discuss the respective weighing of directly affected generations during the next few decades (until the repository’s closure, which affects about four to five generations) compared to justice for (five +) future generations in the following decades and centuries.
Anne Eckhardt, Pius Krütli, and Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 83–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-83-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peer reviews are conducted to improve the quality of scientific publications and can also be applied to the safety case. Research within the TRANSENS project suggests that extending the spectrum of reviewers and using transdisciplinary methods and tools in reviews not only opens perspectives to improve the quality, legitimacy, and acceptance of a safety case, but also increases the resilience of safety on the disposal pathway.
Ingo Hölzle and Pius Krütli
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 257–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-257-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-257-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Site Selection Act (StandAG) defines the selection of a repository as a learning process. Therefore, we would like to identify the manifold learning experiences of stakeholder integration during the site selection procedure, on the one hand, and of transdisciplinary research projects, on the other hand. From the interactive workshop, we expect the identification of key learning areas, their specific relevance for nuclear waste management and the identification of topics for the future.
Anna Lina Kogiomtzidis, Volker Hormann, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 221–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-221-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-221-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Radiation dose estimates over several thousand years, as required for the German site selection procedure, are subject to high uncertainties. Within a transdisciplinary workshop, strategies for communicating such dose estimates and uncertainties are evaluated. Factors will be identified that promote or hinder understandability of modelling results, and the general confidence in the significance of dose estimates as a safety indicator for nuclear waste repositories will be investigated.
Volker Hormann, Anna Kogiomtzidis, and Clemens Walther
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 247–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-247-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-247-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this workshop we would like to raise the question of whether and how this kind of process might be improved. Specifically, in view of the delay in site selection, the haste with which the project was completed should be discussed.
Roman Seidl and Volker Mintzlaff
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 223–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-223-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
On the proposed poster, we report the results of an experimental study (N = 177) that investigated the preferences for and trust in different visualizations of simulation results and tested different modes of communication (verbal, numerical, and visual/graphical). The oral presentation will focus on another challenge of uncertainty communication, namely unquantifiable model uncertainties. In a repository, these may arise from the heterogeneity of the host rock.
Sebastian Götte, Roman Seidl, Ariane Breyer, and Zoë Felder
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 305–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-305-2021, 2021
Oliver Straeter and Pius Krütli
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 307–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-307-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-307-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of the workshop is to present a psychologically resilient communication approach along selected
stepsof the
ten steptransdisciplinarity and to illuminate it with examples from the current process of location selection. It is summarized how this can support the process of further location selection. The workshop is aimed at scientists and practitioners alike. Target size about 15 people.
Short summary
In our project, several disciplines work on issues concerning the management of high-level nuclear waste in Germany. In our sub-project on trust, we have enlisted a group of 16 citizens, reflecting with us on our research questions and approaches. From joint workshops of researchers and these citizens on the role of trust in scientists we find that participants generally want to be taken seriously. Transparent and binding rules for all participants could be the key to a trusting relationship.
In our project, several disciplines work on issues concerning the management of high-level...