Articles | Volume 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-255-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-255-2021
Conference Abstract
 | 
10 Nov 2021
Conference Abstract |  | 10 Nov 2021

Comparing two concepts of the OECD-NEA RK&M Initiative (2011–2019): The Set of Essential Records and the Key Information File

Stephan Hotzel

Related authors

Development and quality assurance of computer programs for the review of long-term safety analysis
Jens Eckel, Martin Navarro, and Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 171–172, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-171-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-171-2021, 2021
A tentative useful-for-all definition of “safety” in the context of radioactive waste disposal
Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 195–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-195-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-195-2021, 2021
What do we need to trust in models?
Ingo Kock, Martin Navarro, Jens Eckel, Carsten Rücker, and Stephan Hotzel
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 303–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-303-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-303-2021, 2021

Cited articles

Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA): Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations – Final Report of the RK&M Initiative, NEA no. 7421, OECD, available at: https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-12/7421-rkm-final.pdf (last access: 3 November 2021), 2019. 
Download