Narratives and images of the future for final disposal
Stefanie Enderle
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS), Karlstraße 11, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Peter Hocke
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS), Karlstraße 11, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Related authors
Stefanie Enderle and Elske Bechthold
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 267–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-267-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-267-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our contribution, we present the key results of the stakeholder workshop
Nuclear Waste Disposal – Possible Paths, Directional Decisions, Future Challenges. In the decade-long process of site selection and final storage, it is highly probable that unforeseen developments will occur and that a response will be needed. We focus on the problems and perceptions of the participants and to what extent the experimental setting of the workshop is suitable for promoting collective problem-solving.
Stefanie Enderle and Elske Bechthold
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 267–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-267-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-267-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our contribution, we present the key results of the stakeholder workshop
Nuclear Waste Disposal – Possible Paths, Directional Decisions, Future Challenges. In the decade-long process of site selection and final storage, it is highly probable that unforeseen developments will occur and that a response will be needed. We focus on the problems and perceptions of the participants and to what extent the experimental setting of the workshop is suitable for promoting collective problem-solving.
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Peter Hocke, Pius Krütli, René Martin, and Ulrich Smeddinck
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 203–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using case examples, insights and experiences from a complex conceptualisation and application process and two years research experience in the TRANSENS project will be presented taking the views of the involved (standing
Working Group Populationand scientists). Particularly, the understanding of transdisciplinarity will be discussed given the varying definitions in literature.
Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig, Marcel Ebeling, Anne Eckhardt, Peter Hocke, and Pius Krütli
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 1, 205–207, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-205-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-1-205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
For specialists, the tool
Safety Case(in the German site selection procedure:
Sicherheitsuntersuchung) is an established instrument for supporting safety-relevant decisions in a stepwise disposal programme. Actors, affected individuals and interested persons have different notions and value judgements about it, though. In the TRANSENS project, it is planned to reveal these notions and judgements and, if possible, to derive conclusions about optimising the safety case concept.